In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3210 is faster than the Core i7-13700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $351 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 69% cheaper – $159.00 vs $509.88
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.80 vs $2.99/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$509.88
31%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
