In Atomfall, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
83%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
