In Atomfall, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core i5-12490F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12490F
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-12490F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
83%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-12490F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i5-12490F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12490F
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
