In Deathloop, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $10 more expensive!
Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 55 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 6 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 6 days newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $149.35 vs $159.00
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Deathloop – $0.65 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
221 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
97%
Price, $
$159
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
92%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
