In Atomfall, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core i3-12100 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $9 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 5% cheaper – $159.00 vs $167.88
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 55 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Core i3-12100
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 days newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 2 days newer
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall – $0.74 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-12100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
83%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
87%
Core i3-12100
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167.88
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-12100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i3-12100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
