In Rust, the Core i3-3120M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 220 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
