In Atomfall, the Core i3-3120M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Mar 02, 2017 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Ryzen 7 1700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Ryzen 7 1700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Ryzen 7 1700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
