Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2471 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3120M - 124 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3120M | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |