In Deathloop, the Core i3-3120M is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 247 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 24 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 12 years and 24 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
