In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-3120M is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 42% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 132 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 12 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 12 years and 3 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$347
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
