In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3120M is faster than the Core i9-7920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7920X
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-7920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
173 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
84%
Price, $
$247.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
