In Atomfall, the Core i3-3120M is slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
