In Atomfall, the Core i3-3120M is slightly slower than the Core i7-7700T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
No clear advantages
Core i7-7700T
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-7700T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$326.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core [4 Core] 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07D9KVGTL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-7700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-7700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
