In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3120M is faster than the Core i7-6800K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6800K
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – May 31, 2016 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-6800K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
176 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
86%
Price, $
$72.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-6800K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i7-6800K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6800K May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
| – | MSRP | $434.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
