In Deathloop, the Core i3-3120M is slightly faster than the Core i5-3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 months and 1 day newer – Sep 30, 2012 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 5 months and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i5-3450
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
