In Atomfall, the Core i3-3120M is slower than the Core i5-13420H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i5-13420H
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-13420H: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-13420H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-13420H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13420H
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13420H Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
