In Deathloop, the Core i3-3120M is slightly faster than the Core i5-10600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3120M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$183.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
