In Atomfall, the Core i3-3110M is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
Core i3-3110M
- Up to 70% cheaper – $69.95 vs $229.89
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.37 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3110M vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
185 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
75%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
30%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3110M vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3110M vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
