In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3110M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10980XE
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-10980XE: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
71%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-10980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-10980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10980XE Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,076.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
