The Core i3-3110M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-6600T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3110M
The Core i5-6600T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-6600T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i3-3110M vs Core i5-6600T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
166
92%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-3110M vs Core i5-6600T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i5-6600T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i5-6600T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3110M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $213.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
