In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-2367M is slower than the Core i9-9960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 17 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9960X
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 83 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 18 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 7 years and 18 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-9960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
83 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-9960X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2367M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
14%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
22 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2367M Oct 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9960X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,684.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2066 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
