In Atomfall, the Core i3-2350M is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2350M vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2350M vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2350M vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2350M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2350M Oct 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
