In Deathloop, the Core i3-2328M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2328M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 35 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 76% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Oct 25, 2016 vs Sep 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-2328M vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$1078.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2328M vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2328M vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2328M
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
9%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2328M Sep 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| – | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
