In Dead Space, the Core i3-2328M is slightly slower than the Core i9-9960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9960X
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-9960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-9960X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2328M
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
14%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
22 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2328M Sep 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9960X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,684.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
