In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-2328M is quite a bit faster than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2328M
- Up to 25% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 214 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2012
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2328M
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2328M Sep 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
