In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-2328M is slower than the Core i7-8700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 24% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 128 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2012
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-2328M vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
128 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
92 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2328M vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2328M
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2328M Sep 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
