In Deathloop, the Core i3-2130 is slightly faster than the Xeon X5680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2130
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Sep 04, 2011 vs Feb 14, 2010
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5680
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-2130 vs Xeon X5680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2130 vs Xeon X5680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2130 vs Xeon X5680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon X5680
Feb 14th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2130 Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5680 Feb 14th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Feb 14th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
