In Deathloop, the Core i3-2130 is slightly slower than the Xeon L5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2130
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Sep 04, 2011 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon L5630
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 40 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-2130 vs Xeon L5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2130 vs Xeon L5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2130 vs Xeon L5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon L5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2130 Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon L5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 40 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
