In Deathloop, the Core i3-2130 is same performance as the Core i5-650. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $22 more expensive!
Core i3-2130
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Sep 04, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 25% cheaper – $63.33 vs $84.91
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Deathloop – $0.28 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-2130 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.91
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
74%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2130 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2130 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2130
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2130 Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
