In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-2120 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2120
- Is 11 months and 6 days newer – Feb 20, 2011 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-2120 vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2120
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
199 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
97%
Price, $
$170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2120 vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2120 vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2120
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2120 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
