In Rust, the Core i3-2120 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $22 more expensive!
Core i3-2120
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 229 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 13% cheaper – $148.08 vs $170.00
- Up to 13% cheaper
- Up to 21% better value in Rust – $0.64 vs $0.81/FPS
- Up to 21% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-2120 vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2120
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
208 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
72%
Price, $
$170
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
79%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2120 vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2120 vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2120
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2120 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
