In Atomfall, the Core i3-2100 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $514 cheaper!
Core i3-2100
- Up to 91% cheaper – $49.00 vs $563.41
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall – $0.25 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2100 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
21%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
