In Atomfall, the Core i3-2100 is slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $500 cheaper!
Core i3-2100
- Up to 91% cheaper – $49.00 vs $548.89
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall – $0.26 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
76%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
