In Atomfall, the Core i3-2100 is slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $481 cheaper!
Core i3-2100
- Up to 91% cheaper – $49.00 vs $529.91
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall – $0.25 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
189 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
77%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.91
9%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
