In Atomfall, the Core i3-2100 is slower than the Core i5-11600. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $91 cheaper!
Core i3-2100
- Up to 65% cheaper – $49.00 vs $140.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall – $0.26 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 24 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 10 years and 24 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
186 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
82%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
35%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
42%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
