In Atomfall, the Core i3-2100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $127 cheaper!
Core i3-2100
- Up to 72% cheaper – $49.00 vs $175.99
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.25 vs $0.83/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
189 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
89%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.99
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2100 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
