Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $90.09 vs $416.96
- Up to 77% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900KF - $0.67 vs $2.96 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-14100F - 141 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
134
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7495 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.96/FPS
23%
Price, $
$416.96
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7495 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |