In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-14100 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-14100
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 60 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-14100 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
217 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
90%
Price, $
$139.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1156 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
