In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-14100 is slightly slower than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-14100
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3530
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-14100 vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$138.54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
