In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-14100 is quite a bit faster than the Xeon E5-2620 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-14100
- Up to 39% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 145 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 60 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2620 v2
No clear advantages
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
145 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
105 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-14100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
