In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-14100 is slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $86 more expensive!
Core i3-14100
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 60 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 58% cheaper – $63.33 vs $149.35
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.31 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-14100 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
83%
Price, $
$149.35
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
35%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-14100 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-14100 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1156 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
