In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1650 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v4: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$455.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1650 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $621.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
