In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100T is slightly slower than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8320
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
