In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100T is slower than the FX-6100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-6100
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
