In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-13100T is slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 19% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 131 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
131 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
72%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$134.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
