In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100T is slower than the Core i7-860. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Is 13 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 13 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-860
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs Core i7-860: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i7-860 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i7-860 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
