In Deathloop, the Core i3-13100T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4160. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100T
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
97%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
