In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100 is slightly slower than the Xeon X5690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5690
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 190 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100 vs Xeon X5690: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100 vs Xeon X5690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100 vs Xeon X5690 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon X5690
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.733 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5690 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
60 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
