In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-13100 is slower than the Xeon L5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-13100
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon L5630
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 40 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100 vs Xeon L5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100 vs Xeon L5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100 vs Xeon L5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon L5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.4 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon L5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 60 W | Power Consumption | 40 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
