In Battlefield 1, the Core i3-13100 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $41 more expensive!
Core i3-13100
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 1 – 264 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 1
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 29% cheaper – $98.95 vs $139.99
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Battlefield 1 – $0.40 vs $0.53/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Battlefield 1
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Battlefield 1 FPS Calculator
Core i3-13100 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
264 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$139.99
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
75%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
247 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-13100 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-13100 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-13100 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $134.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 60W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
